Public Reason and Bioethics
نویسنده
چکیده
1. Rawls puts forward a proposal of political philosophy suitable for a pluralistic society where members try to establish and make persistent a stable social cooperation. The proposal is very sophisticated and takes into consideration numerous elements of a complex society. First of all, it is worth pointing out that the model of society proposed by Rawls is a liberal society, based on the ideal of free and equal citizens. Let's see the Rawlsian basic principle of liberty: «Each person has an equal claim to a fully adequate scheme of basic rights and liberties, which scheme is compatible with the same scheme for all». The basic liberties specified by Rawls are freedom of political speech, assembly and participation; freedom of thought and conscience; freedom of association; freedom of the person; and freedom from arbitrary arrest and seizure as associated with the rule of law. Let's take the principle as non problematic as such, and as something we presuppose in the debate. There are still problems of application. First, there is the problem of establishing whether the content of basic liberties is well represented by the extension indicated by Rawls. Second, even if we accept this list, these freedoms are abstract, and, therefore, there is still the problem of determining the scope of each of these liberties. We can think about numerous examples that arise in the public debate. Do, for example, some statements on the policy concerning immigrants count as protected by the freedom of political speech, or are they excluded? In what follows in the paper, I will focus on examples in the domain of bioethics. At this point, the important distinction is that between comprehensive doctrines and political views. Comprehensive doctrines are those that include the full metaphysical and religious premises to which one can appeal, in order to find support for a specific moral question. These are highly controversial
منابع مشابه
Religion and Public Reason in the Politics of Biotechnology
Questions about the relevance of religious views to public policy have been central in debates over the governance of biotechnology since the 1960s. This article offers an empirical analysis of moments of deliberative politics surrounding human embryo research, primarily within public bioethics bodies. I examine how these bodies have used the idea of public reason as developed in deliberative d...
متن کاملDeveloping and teaching the virtue-ethics foundations of healthcare whistle blowing.
Healthcare whistle blowing, despite the benefits it has brought to healthcare systems in many developed countries, remains generally regarded as a pariah activity by many of the most influential healthcare professionals and regulatory institutions. Few if any medical schools or law department health law and bioethics classes, teach whistle blowing in a formal sense. Yet without exception, publi...
متن کاملConcepts of health and disease: comments on chapter 5 of Engelhardt's The Foundations of Bioethics, 2nd edition.
Tris Engelhardt's The Foundations of Bioethics stands out in its field for the amount of sustained attention it pays to the epistemological foundations of ethics. Among those working in the field of bioethics, no one has devoted more attention to those foundations, and in particular to the matrix of concepts associated with medical elassification, diagnosis, explanation and treatment. This is t...
متن کاملEthics and infectious disease.
Bioethics apparently suffers from a misdistribution of research resources analogous to the '10/90' divide in medical research. Though infectious disease should be recognized as a topic of primary importance for bioethics, the general topic of infectious disease has received relatively little attention from the discipline of bioethics in comparison with things like abortion, euthanasia, genetics...
متن کامل